PSA comes out swinging on pay

hand out for money - coins in palm

The Pharmaceutical Society has put forward a submission to Fair Work in which it says pharmacists performing certain reviews and services should get a pay rise

PSA has sent a message to its members outlining the work it is doing to increase pharmacist remuneration.

In its submission to the Fair Work Commission’s four-yearly review of the Pharmacy Industry Award 2010, PSA says current remuneration should be increased to reflect accredited pharmacists’ additional training, experience and responsibility.

“PSA has called for accredited pharmacists who are required to perform Residential Medication Management Reviews (RMMR) or Home Medicines Reviews (HMR) (and any other services which may in future be required to be done by an accredited pharmacist) to be paid an extra 18% of the minimum weekly wage applicable to a pharmacist on top of their award rate,” writes PSA national president Dr Chris Freeman in the communication to members.

“The additional 18%, which would be paid as an allowance, would place their award rate between pharmacist-in-charge and pharmacist manager.

“Pharmacy owners would not be required to pay this loading if the pharmacist is not required to perform RMMRs or HMRs.”

Dr Freeman cites the PSA’s recent report, Pharmacists in 2023, which looks into the immediate future of the profession and states that pharmacists need to be recognised and appropriately remunerated to reflect their training, expertise and quality patient care.

“An important part of this is making sure pharmacists are appropriately remunerated for undertaking professional services that require them to hold an accredited pharmacist qualification.”

The PSA has also asked the President of the FWC to consider the discrepancy between pharmacists’ extensive qualifications and their award rate of pay.

“We have a complete disconnect where the award rate for pharmacists, who have completed a four-year degree to become medicines experts, is lower than that of manufacturing workers with a diploma-level education,” writes Dr Freeman.

“The inadequate remuneration for pharmacists fails to recognise the time they have devoted to education so they can deliver high-quality healthcare services.

“Increasing remuneration will reflect pharmacists’ vital contribution to the health system and help the pharmacy profession retain our best and brightest.”

Previous ‘We need a new approach to mental health.’
Next Should pharmacists be able to prescribe contraceptives?

NOTICE: It can sometimes take awhile for comment submissions to go through, please be patient.


  1. Debbie Rigby

    Great to see PSA advocating for recognition of increased skills, knowledge and responsibility for pharmacists conducting medication reviews and other future credentialed services and programs. It should encourage more pharmacists to embrace the ethos of life-long learning and collaborative care. Gaining additional qualifications and credentials and the impact of taking greater responsibility for patient care and better medication management will also contribute to recognition of advanced practice. All of this can ultimately lead to heightened professional satisfaction and advancement of the role of a pharmacist in the healthcare system.

  2. Michael Post

    This appears to be a veiled approach to revenue raise . PSA have a direct financial interest in accredited training.

    Having a caveat that the proposed award increase will not apply should reviews not be required is naive. The reviews will be ‘optional’ thus avoiding the award and the status quo of percentage review remains .

    Life long learning is an ethos that comes naturally to most human beings and pharmacists are in a field of constant change hence life long learning is unavoidable .

    The business of paying for a qualification without increased remuneration supports the benevolent role pharmacist employees languish in . Qualification does not equate to knowledge or patient care. There are plenty of free resources in our digital world that can advance our ability and skill set without setting us back financially.

    Advancement has a price.

  3. William

    Such members of PSA who want to claim a higher rate are mad.
    If they cannot do such tasks as part of their normal job as a pharmacist they should be struck off as they are admitting that they only could do it if paid more.
    And they want to claim to be “professionals”. Unbelievable!

  4. pagophilus

    Many pharmacists should get a pay rise anyway, without doing any extra services. The minimum should be lifted considerably.

  5. Gavin Mingay

    “PSA COMES OUT SWINGING” – like being slapped with a wet piece of lettuce…

    Come out and say the whole award needs to be raised – but that would greatly affect a large new major client… 🙁

Leave a reply