Retail giants drove $1 discount uptake

codeine medicine pills pharmacy pharmacist patient customer consult sale

Large discount chains and urban pharmacies are the predominant adopters of the controversial $1 PBS discount, data shows

A much higher proportion of scripts have been subject to the $1 PBS co-payment discount in urban locations and by large discount pharmacy chains, according to information presented to Parliament. 

A Department of Health response to a question at the May round of Senate Estimates hearings revealed that large discount chains applied the $1 discount to around 80 per cent of PBS scripts they dispensed.

In contrast, pharmacies who were not part of a recognised discount chain only applied the discount to around 25 per cent of scripts they dispensed.

A similar discrepancy occurred according to location, with much higher proportions of scripts having the discount applied in urban areas. 

“The more remote a pharmacy was, the lower the proportion of PBS scripts to which the $1 discount was applied,” the Department said in its response.

The $1 PBS co-payment discount has been available for pharmacies to apply to prescriptions since 1 January 2016.

Speaking to AJP earlier this year, a Guild spokesperson said the optional dollar discount was “a flawed piece of health policy and we have opposed it from the beginning”.

“It breaches the universality of the PBS – because it means some patients will pay more than other patients for the same subsidised medicine. It also provides no net financial benefit for the sickest and neediest patients who will pay the same total amount in the calendar year for their medicines – but their access to the safety net will be delayed. 

“The discount also discriminates against patients in rural and regional Australia where economic conditions might mean local pharmacies are unable to provide the discount. All in all, a very bad policy, and we continue to explore ways to be rid of it”.

Previous Pharmacy program gets bigger
Next ‘This is purely about money making from a pharmacist perspective’

NOTICE: It can sometimes take awhile for comment submissions to go through, please be patient.


  1. Paul Sapardanis

    End the $1 discount NOW! The dispensing of scheduled medicines should not be used as a marketing tool. Introduce a floor price for ALL dispensing as well.

    • Gavin Mingay

      If pharmacies are going to dispense $6 private benzo scripts or $7 schedule 8 scripts, do not allow them to dispense PBS prescriptions…

      • Apotheke

        By supplying prescription medicines at such a low price what are we as Pharmacists saying about the “value of our training, skill and experience”? In my mind we are saying to the public that sticking a label on a bottle of cheap medicine is a task of no or very little value so you need not pay me much at all. I ask you have you recently had a tradesman come to your house, an electrician, plumber,roofer etc. What did they charge you just to come to your property? Was it in the vicinity of $120 for the visit incl the first 15-30mins of their time? Did they offer to come for free or to discount I think not. So why do Pharmacists discount their Labour and say it is worth NOTHING!!!! Collectively Pharmacists are fools and have very little professional pride to our detriment. Time to wake up and start acting in a professional manner. Agree on a minimum fee for a dispensing service to cover Labour and other costs and stop using dispensing as a loss leader in your Pharmacy. It would also help if the Pharmacy Board and PSA starting enforcing professional standards of conduct esp at the big box retailers.

Leave a reply