Could a robot take your job?

Could pharmacists be made obsolete by apps and robots?

Stakeholders in the US seem to think pharmacists’ traditional role could be automated – and that robots could do a better job of “a perfect job for a robot: a repetitive and mundane task”.

The Future of You health and technology blog cites the case of the UCSF Medical Center in California, which for the last five years has relied on an automated “robot pharmacy” to fill prescriptions, and a fleet of thousands of autonomous bots to deliver them to patients.

It quotes UCSF program director Rita Jew, who says the robots work with 100% accuracy, and that humans are only involved in two aspects of the process: stocking the medications into canisters which are taken from racks by the robots, and sending the packaged, labelled medicines that come out the other end on their way.

In the case of medicines being sent to a hospitalised patient at the centre, a human “might hand them off to a Tug robot that rolls around the hospital from floor to floor, dropping off prescriptions at each nurse’s station”.

According to Jew, only two technicians – at most – are now required to interface with the robots, while other techs had been reassigned to other jobs such as collecting medication history.

In the past, seven pharmacy technicians pulled the drugs, supervised by three to four pharmacists.

In the UK, Keith Ridge, England’s Chief Pharmaceutical Officer, is on record saying that error rates are lower in the hub-and-spoke model and that pharmacists have a professional obligation to use automated dispensing processes.

“Technology and automation are going to do a whole lot of things that the traditional pharmacist has done,” Dr Marilyn Stebbins, a pharmacy professor and vice-chair of clinical innovation at UCSF, told Future of You.

“If the pharmacists don’t prove their value outside of their existing roles, automation will win because ultimately it will be cheaper.”

Pharmacists need to take on jobs that robots simply can’t replicate, the piece warns. For example, California has recently permitted pharmacists who have certain training and expertise to take on a more active role in primary care, including reviewing medication histories and prescribing medicines like birth control and nicotine replacements.

Dr Lisa Kroon, a clinical pharmacy professor at UCSF, says this is a pivot in the role of pharmacists, who need to take up the opportunities.

“But so far this new role doesn’t come with any extra pay for extra services,” notes writer Mallory Pickett.

“The new law doesn’t include regulations to allow pharmacists to be paid for their services. Pharmacists are still reimbursed just for the products they provide.

“So Stebbins says pharmacists’ potential to fill gaps in the healthcare system may remain untapped until there’s some way to pay them for it.”

A 2013 UK study found that pharmacists were the 54th least likely to lose their jobs to robots – out of 702 occupations.

The authors said their predictions were “intuitive in that most management, business, and finance occupations, which are intensive in generalist tasks requiring social intelligence, are largely confined to the low risk category. The same is true of most occupations in education, healthcare, as well as arts and media jobs.”

Recreational therapists were the least likely to be automated, with telemarketers the most likely to lose their jobs to robots.

Previous Pharmacy sector to enter a 'terror zone'
Next Forum: Doctors are handing out Endone like lollies

NOTICE: It can sometimes take awhile for comment submissions to go through, please be patient.


  1. Tony Pal

    Can a robot extrapolate an answer to an unknown similar situation, moderate a response to be sensitive to an individual’s particular circumstance (weight anxiety or death in family), or sensitively describe the function of a placebo that the doctor kept secret from a disturbed patient. As in any job some parts are routine and some parts need the human touch. Robots in the 60s & 70s were going to be the death of all manufacturing related jobs and instead they created new jobs. Robots have a multiplier effect, where one person can do the work of many (look at what happened to secretarial pools in the 1920′ & 30’s), and the many go on to more interesting things that didn’t previously exist.

  2. David Haworth

    I’m going to get in first and retrain as a Robot service and repair tech

    • Mike

      Apparently there’s a robot for that as well David

  3. Paulina Stehlik

    Wait so what are we defining the pharmacist’s job as? Putting labels on boxes?? Is’t that what we have techs for? Pretty sure my job as a PHARMACIST is damn safe then.

  4. Pharmacist

    Pharmacists play a key role in ensuring that medications are correctly dispensed and that the patient receives adequate counselling. This is a role you cannot take away from the pharmacist. However, replacing dispensary technicians, or eliminating the need for pharmacists to stick labels on the boxes, by using robots may not be such a bad idea (AS LONG AS THERE’S A PHARMACIST AT THE VERY END TO DO A FINAL CHECK AND COUNSEL THE PATIENT). This will only increase the efficiency of the dispensing process and allow pharmacists to take up key roles in other areas. Pharmacists need to move away from the generalization of “they just put labels on boxes”. Leave that to the robots and become known for the counselling, the involvement in primary care and provision of services!

Leave a reply