Some healthcare workers ‘deterrents’ to vax uptake


vaccination older lady elderly woman

Pharmacy staff, chiropractors found among selection of healthcare practitioners voicing anti-vaccination beliefs to patients, according to Australian study

A qualitative study has looked at the perspective of older people relating to influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations.

Researchers interviewed 36 participants aged between 65 and 84 years, recruited from Queensland and New South Wales, between July 2017 and January 2018.

Uptake of the flu vaccine was 78% among the sample – higher than the national vaccination rate of 74.6% in this age group.

Nearly 40% that reported being vaccinated against pneumococcal disease had also received the flu vaccine.

Five key themes were health practitioner influence; anti-vaccination influence; social responsibility; work-based vaccination; and perceptions of age.

“As participants described their perspectives on vaccination, it became clear during analysis that decisions to vaccinate for many participants were the result of accumulating influences,” wrote the authors from the School of Human Services and Social Work at Griffith University in Queensland.

“Some of these were highly individual, for example, exposure to pandemics, death of a parent due to pneumonia, a child with a disability, and personal illness events contributed to their decisions to vaccinate or not,” they wrote in the journal Vaccine.

Even when receptive to vaccination, participants generally felt those in need of vaccination were less healthy or older than themselves.

“I associate [pneumonia] with old people. And I’m not that,” said a 73-year-old participant.

Prompts such as posters, brochures, reminder telephone calls and computer-generated letters to vaccinate against the flu were considered effective.

Providing flu vaccination in the workplace also had a positive effect on continuing this behaviour in later life.

The majority of participants placed their trust and confidence in recommendations and information from their GPs, and those who had been immunised against pneumococcal disease had done so at their doctor’s recommendation.

One [participant] preferred to ward off influenza by taking homeopathic drops provided by a naturopath.

However some health practitioners acted as deterrents to uptake behaviours, the researchers found.

Two nurses expressed anti-vaccination beliefs to two participants – one while administering an influenza vaccination.

Some pharmacy staff (number unspecified), three chiropractors and one GP who practised alternative medicine were openly anti-vaccination, as reported by participants.

Only participants who held pre-existing anti-vaccination beliefs uncritically accepted these perspectives, said the authors.

Where health professionals or close relatives rejected vaccinations, participants made their own decisions based on a range of factors including their own beliefs.

“My chiropractor is always going on about it [not having vaccinations] … But if you’re coming from one side you’re often not open to the reasons on the other side, so I think I probably make more of my own informed decision given all the information I get from other people,” said one participant.

There were “tensions” within families that had different perspectives – for example, two participants were vaccinated despite opposing views of their spouses.

The majority were open to vaccinations even when there was disagreement in their families.

Three participants held anti-vaccination beliefs; these did not support any vaccination, despite knowledge of disease and its consequences.

“One [participant] preferred to ward off influenza by taking homeopathic drops provided by a naturopath,” said the researchers.

Pharmacists in South Australia and Western Australia began administering approved vaccines, including the flu vaccine, in early 2015. Those in Tasmania, ACT, NSW, QLD and Victoria followed suit in 2016.

Previous 7CPA talks kick off
Next Research Roundup

NOTICE: It can sometimes take awhile for comment submissions to go through, please be patient.

7 Comments

  1. Report them all.
    Loudly and publicly protest the nurses and pharmacists/pharmacy workers who peddle this anti-vaccine pseudoscience… and report them to their employers and professional orgs.

    It should be clear that chiroquacks are not doctors but witch doctors who believe in pre-scientific vitalistic magic. They deserve nothing but laughter and ridicule for their childish beliefs.

    The anti-science, anti-vaccine “alt-med” doctors should also be reported to the authorities for quackery.
    File a complaint.

    • pagophilus
      09/07/2019

      How about the high profile doctors/academics such as Prof Peter Collignon, known for his pieces about the ineffectiveness of flu vaccines?

      People need the full picture.

      • Sheshtyn Paola
        09/07/2019

        Prof Peter Collignon does not espouse anti vaccination beliefs. He has argued that the flu vaccine is less effective compared with the high effectiveness of other vaccines. Very different, don’t you think?

        • pagophilus
          09/07/2019

          But some would not allow any discussion of the real world effectiveness of influenza vaccine.

          • Sheshtyn Paola
            09/07/2019

            That’s a different discussion I think Pagophilus. I believe that, in this study, “anti-vaccination beliefs” referred to not supporting any vaccination at all, as opposed to a discussion on the real world effectiveness of the influenza vaccine specifically.

      • Who is Collignon and what about him?
        As long as he is stating fact and not opinion, and not leaving important facts out, I’d have no problem with him. But to use 1 person’s opinion dogmatically as *the* expert is absolutely unscientific no matter what their position.
        The totality of the known science should be discussed.
        Therefore, telling people that the influenza vaccine is probably our worst performing vaccine but it still conveys an average of 45% effectiveness for the last 10 years would be accurate:
        https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/past-seasons-estimates.html.
        To portray this performance as useless would be dishonest and should be called out.
        .
        To greatly magnify the very rare serious side effects of the vaccine would be dishonest and should be called out.
        .
        What does Ellen G. White say about vaccines, pagophilus?

Leave a reply